<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Grading the 2005 NFL draft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://otr.blastmagazine.com/2008/04/30/grading-the-2005-nfl-draft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://otr.blastmagazine.com/2008/04/30/grading-the-2005-nfl-draft/</link>
	<description>Back to Basics. Design to follow.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 00:58:52 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Micah Warren</title>
		<link>http://otr.blastmagazine.com/2008/04/30/grading-the-2005-nfl-draft/comment-page-1/#comment-2308</link>
		<dc:creator>Micah Warren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 01:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://otr.blastmagazine.com/2008/04/30/grading-the-2005-nfl-draft/#comment-2308</guid>
		<description>But Neetz, they blew the #1 overall so I offset them.  And according to my fist that is currently clenched tightly, you will to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But Neetz, they blew the #1 overall so I offset them.  And according to my fist that is currently clenched tightly, you will to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neetz</title>
		<link>http://otr.blastmagazine.com/2008/04/30/grading-the-2005-nfl-draft/comment-page-1/#comment-2307</link>
		<dc:creator>Neetz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 01:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://otr.blastmagazine.com/2008/04/30/grading-the-2005-nfl-draft/#comment-2307</guid>
		<description>Interesting read.  I agree with most of your grades, except San Francisco.  Sure Gore is injury prone, but to get that type of talent in the 3rd round deserves an overall grade of better than C-.  1695 rushing yards in 2006 and 1102 rushing yards in 2007 is pretty impressive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting read.  I agree with most of your grades, except San Francisco.  Sure Gore is injury prone, but to get that type of talent in the 3rd round deserves an overall grade of better than C-.  1695 rushing yards in 2006 and 1102 rushing yards in 2007 is pretty impressive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://otr.blastmagazine.com/2008/04/30/grading-the-2005-nfl-draft/comment-page-1/#comment-2296</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 17:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://otr.blastmagazine.com/2008/04/30/grading-the-2005-nfl-draft/#comment-2296</guid>
		<description>Nice job... I agree, draft grades don&#039;t mean anything unless it&#039;s done years later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice job&#8230; I agree, draft grades don&#8217;t mean anything unless it&#8217;s done years later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
